<ARCHIVE> | CAMPBELTOWN HIGHLANDS ISLANDS ISLAY LOWLANDS SPEYSIDE | AMERICAN CANADIAN IRISH WORLD | INDEPENDENT | ANCNOC ARDBEG BENRIACH BOWMORE BUFFALO TRACE CARN MOR COMPASS BOX DEANSTON DOUGLAS LAING FERMENTORIUM FORTY CREEK GLENDRONACH GLENMORANGIE HIGHLAND PARK JACK DANIELS JP WISERS JURA KILCHOMAN KNOB CREEK LAPHROAIG MACALLAN MIDLETON ODD SOCIETY OLD PULTENEY SHELTER POINT TWO BREWERS

Laphroaig 10-Year Cask Strength Batch 07

56.3% ABV - Islay, Scotland

Nose: High octane peat. Lots of tar, creosote, and burnt wood flavours. With the addition of water it is a whole new experience and touches on fruits and citrus with a very similar profile to the regular 10-Year.

Taste: Higher octane peat. The same flavours—still tarry, still burnt—are starting to be wrapped up in some orange citrus and lighter fruit notes. There is a delicious beach fire and earthy root that emerges with the addition of water.

Finish: Quite quick, peat and smoked with a spicy edge. Pouring water over the campfire at the end of the night.

Laphroaig 10-Year Cask Strength is definitely darker than the regular 10-Year—not surprising. What I do find interesting is the nose is so much more muted than the 10-Year. Maybe it’s that the flavours are locked up in the higher ABV? I’m not sure! Suffice to say that it was initially underwhelming. From some of the reviews I had read, this one is supposed to be "one of the better cask strength batch releases", so I likely had some bias or high expectations.

The label on the back of the bottle suggests adding twice as much water as there is whisky. I felt that after an initial nosing and taste that this dram really needed some water added—it is not as refined or (dare I say it) "smooth" as some other whiskies that hit above 100 proof. Nonetheless, start small with the water as I found it needed way less than suggested.

The Laphroaig 10-Year Cask Strength is a great value if you can find it on the shelf. I think that if these were regularly available in the Canadian market then I wouldn’t buy the regular 10-Year as much. However, since it isn’t, the price to get it on the secondary or grey market… probably not worth it!

Details: Bottled January 2015.

Tasted 12 June 2021. (Posted 17 October 2021.)

89/100
Detailed Rating Information...

90+: Fantastic whisky; highly recommended.
My favourite whiskies – I might have more than one bottle if the price is right and the supply is limited! The higher values in this range will reflect a stronger balance and consistency between components.
85-89: Great whisky; recommended.
Whiskies that tick the flavour boxes and you'll likely hear about these from me. An easy decision to order at a bar/restaurant and one to consider buying a bottle of.
80-84: Very good whisky; recommended, but still consider trying before you buy.
Most of these whiskies I was really happy to have the opportunity to taste, but, apart from a dram here and there, I don’t think I would buy a bottle.
75-79: Good whisky; consider trying before you buy.
These are whiskies that I did enjoy drinking, but likely would reach for another bottle or select something different to order.
65-74: Average; consider trying before you buy, but not recommended.
There is nothing that stood out about this whisky and I might be inclined to mix it with soda or in a cocktail, instead of trying to enjoy its own flavours.
50-64: Bad; not recommended.
I didn’t like this and would sooner pass on another opportunity and order a beer instead than have it again… but never say never.


Whisky Bottle