<ARCHIVE> | CAMPBELTOWN HIGHLANDS ISLANDS ISLAY LOWLANDS SPEYSIDE | AMERICAN CANADIAN IRISH WORLD | INDEPENDENT | ANCNOC ARDBEG BENRIACH BOWMORE BUFFALO TRACE CARN MOR COMPASS BOX DEANSTON DOUGLAS LAING FERMENTORIUM GLENDRONACH GLENMORANGIE HIGHLAND PARK JACK DANIELS JP WISERS JURA KILCHOMAN KNOB CREEK LAPHROAIG MACALLAN ODD SOCIETY OLD PULTENEY SHELTER POINT TWO BREWERS

Bowmore 18-Year Deep & Complex

43% ABV - Islay, Scotland

Nose: Dark red fruits, nectarine, raisin, and sherry spices. There is a hint of chocolate and caramelized fruit sugars.

Taste: Cherries, an orchard fruit compote, and spices. Interestingly, I’d classify this as “more peat than smoke” if that makes sense – maybe more from the earthy side than the smoky side. Blood orange citrus (red oranges) really shines on the development.

Finish: Dried and baked red fruits, spices, ginger, and gentle cusps of smoke.

This expression has a very, very tasty development into the finish. The nose benefits from water and time, but the rest you can dive right into. I find this to be easy drinking, but I would probably not choose this to introduce someone to whisky with – or Bowmore in general, for that matter. It’s quite a bit different than the 15-Year Darkest, which is the closest (available) expression we have to compare with – and a bit more of an accessible malt. The wood notes and spices are much more pronounced in this bottling, and the ex-Sherry character is more intense. It’s guesswork for the exact recipe, but I’d imagine it has spent the majority, if not all, of its time inside ex-Sherry casks. And probably fairly active casks, unless it is just a second maturation or finishing. ...It really would be great if distilleries were more transparent about this!

Is it “Deep” as per the label? I imagine that is a reference to the colour – so the answer is yes, definitely. The spirit is likely only this deep of colour by addition of the E150 colouring agent. And this caramel colouring is not always a bad thing… if there is any solace, we are made to believe that the amount added cannot make the whisky more dark than as it was drawn straight from the cask. The colour adds to the experience, and, call it false advertising if you will, there still is a certain pleasure to it.

Is it “Complex” as per the label? I might not have used that descriptor myself, but, again, yes it does have a good level of complexity to it. I like to call a whisky “complex” when I am able to pull out specific flavours. For example, instead of only saying “red fruits” there might be nectarine, or plum, or cherry that stands out individually. So the name is a bit silly, like the rest of the Bowmore 2017 Travel Retail Exclusive (TRE) range, but still better than any No Age Statement as it saves them from cooking up a marketing story to explain it!

It would be amazing to side-by-side this with the standard core range 18-Year and any other equivalent age – such as the 18-Year Manzanilla Cask from the Vintner’s Trilogy! I think the peat levels amongst those Bowmores are all varying intensities and that would make for a great experience. (And completely unrelated to the quality or presentation of this spirit, but this bottle I have has a satisfyingly tight fitting cork – that squeaking during the twist off is sublime!)

Note: This whisky was tasted alongside the other 2017 Bowmore TREs: 10-Year Dark & Intense and 15-Year Golden & Elegant.

Tasting Notes (Official): Breathe In: Rich dark chocolate, treacle toffee and date oil. Sip: Bitter-sweet orange peel and peat-smoke roasted coffee. Savour: Velvet mocha and macadamia nut chocolate.

Tasted 22 May 2019. (Posted 27 May 2019.)

92/100
Detailed Rating Information...

90+: Fantastic whisky; highly recommended.
My favourite whiskies – I might have more than one bottle if the price is right and the supply is limited! The higher values in this range will reflect a stronger balance and consistency between components.
85-89: Great whisky; recommended.
Whiskies that tick the flavour boxes and you'll likely hear about these from me. An easy decision to order at a bar/restaurant and one to consider buying a bottle of.
80-84: Very good whisky; recommended, but still consider trying before you buy.
Most of these whiskies I was really happy to have the opportunity to taste, but, apart from a dram here and there, I don’t think I would buy a bottle.
75-79: Good whisky; consider trying before you buy.
These are whiskies that I did enjoy drinking, but likely would reach for another bottle or select something different to order.
65-74: Average; consider trying before you buy, but not recommended.
There is nothing that stood out about this whisky and I might be inclined to mix it with soda or in a cocktail, instead of trying to enjoy its own flavours.
50-64: Bad; not recommended.
I didn’t like this and would sooner pass on another opportunity and order a beer instead than have it again… but never say never.


Whisky Bottle